reenactor.Net's Online, Reenacting Events Calendar
Our Reenacting Events Calendar

reenactor.Net's Main Page
Ancient Periods of History
The Middle Ages
1600-1800
The Frontier Period
Native American Reenacting
1800-1865
The American Civil War
1870-1900
World War I
World War II
1946-Present

Add a Reenacting Unit Link button art

EMC Militaria micro ad

How to Re-Size Photos for posting on this site.

Marsh's Blog

This site is Gunny Approved

Author Topic: women civil war reenactors  (Read 5130 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tleve

  • Reenactor
  • *
  • Posts: 137
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • the living history alliance
women civil war reenactors
« on: August 07, 2007, 01:47:05 PM »
ok i am starting one here and in the confed. area as well , I know a few of you have been asking about women in reenacting . well we will start here and go form here . We are going to need a topic ... any ideas?
" No Good Deed Goes Unpunished "

Offline Haruka

  • Boot
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • P|-|34|2 |\/|3!
Re: women civil war reenactors
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2009, 07:40:09 PM »
Hello, everyone!  I just joined the board today and I have been reenacting actively for about a year. 

I've run into something of an issue and I'm curious about other people's take on it.  The issue is HAIR.  Now, most of the ladies I reenact with use CDVs and issues of Godey's and Peterson's to create the hairstyles for their impressions, which is great.  However, I have bangs and would rather not smothe them down and I'm catching a bit of noise from other ladies about not doing so.  Now, my question is, is it possible that bangs were maybe not common, but existed in everyday wear on grown women? 

Using CDVs and the lady's periodicals of the day is an excellent idea, but CDVs were expensive and could only be done every so often.  When taken, the subject would want to look as fashionable as possible and would most likely use plates and articles from Peterson's or Godey's to do so, just as a woman today might use Cosmo or Vanity Fair to look her best for a studio photo.  But would they really have the time to do their hair like that everyday?  And would they want to? 

Not everyone follows the whims of fashion, even today.  I never have.  I don't wear make-up, I don't really do too much with my hair on a regular basis and my clothing is always very casual.  When I have a studio portrait done, on the other hand, out comes the make-up, I spend an hour or more on my hair and find my nicest clothing.  My professional photos look nothing like the casual photos of me.  SO is it possible that ladies of the 1860's did the same thing?  Or am I alone out on this limb?
Growing old is mandatory.  Growing up is optional.